Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cleanwell

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:54, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Cleanwell

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Cleanwell doesn't appear to be notable. The sources are overwhelmingly primary and a quick google search doesn't bring up a whole lot of independent coverage. The World's Signature (talk) 19:20, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Colorado-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:55, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:55, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - The article is promotional and the company does not seem to meet WP:CORPDEPTH and WP:GNG. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 13:41, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No citations to reliable third-party secondary sources. bd2412 T 20:28, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, as I am unable to fin content that is not of as above. Couldn't find any more sourceings. I know the best wiki (talk) 21:23, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.